If you have a Public Provident Fund (PPF) account, there’s some news for
you. You can now close your account after 5 years. Yes, you read it
right. You can completely withdraw the balance in your PPF account
any time after 5 years, if you satisfy a few conditions. Recently, the
Government amended Public Provident Fund Scheme, 1968,
relaxing the provisions of premature withdrawals with an immediate
effect.
Until now, you were allowed to withdraw only after the expiry of 5 full
financial years from the end of the year in which your initial
subscription was made, but the withdrawal was limited to 50% of the
balance at credit at the end of fourth year, immediately preceding the
year in which the amount is to be withdrawn or the balance at the end of
the preceding year, whichever is lower, as per the PPF rulebook.
Thereafter, you were allowed one withdrawal per year. So for example, if
you were to open a PPF account on April 1, 2006, you were allowed first
withdrawal after April 1, 2012, and the
amount of withdrawal was limited to 50% of the balance as on - March 31,
2008, or the balance as on - March 31, 2011, whichever is lower;
subject to loan taken on your PPF account.
What has changed?
Now after the expiry of 5 years, you’re allowed to close the PPF account
and withdraw all the money, on the grounds that the amount is required
for treatment of serious ailments or life-threatening diseases that you,
your spouse, dependent children or parents may suffer. However, to be
able to do so, you have to produce the documents supporting this claim
signed by a competent medical authority.
Likewise, if you need money to fund your children’s higher education in
India or even abroad, the Government has relaxed premature withdrawal
norms. But here too, proofs such as fee bills and other documents
confirming the admission in a recognised institute are required. It is
noteworthy that, the wording of Government notification is silent about
you withdrawing money from your account for the children’s higher
education. However, if the account holder is a minor, you as his/her
guardian, can withdraw money for his/her higher education.
But this facility comes with a penalty...
The Government will allow premature closure after deducting interest @
1% for the entire holding period. To be fair, the Government has stated
it will be assumed that the applicable rate of interest on such accounts
was 1% lower for each year than the applicable rates. Therefore,
instead of deducting 1% flat at the closure, the calculation will be
done backwards for each year, to arrive at the amount that is to be
deducted from the accumulated funds in the account.
Admittedly, this is nearly impossible to understand without any
illustration. Suppose you open a PPF account in your name on April 1,
2006 and religiously deposited Rs 12,000 in first 5 days of every
financial year. Now if you plan to close your account on March 31, 2016,
the full and final settlement of your account would be done in the
following manner.
Premature Closure of PPF Account...
Year |
Opening Balance |
Fresh Deposits |
Total Amount |
Normal
Rate of Interest |
Rate Applicable
On These Accounts |
Interest Accrued |
Outstanding Balance |
2006-07 |
0 |
12,000 |
12,000 |
8.0% |
7.0% |
840 |
12,840 |
2007-08 |
12,840 |
12,000 |
24,840 |
8.0% |
7.0% |
1,739 |
26,579 |
2008-09 |
26,579 |
12,000 |
38,579 |
8.0% |
7.0% |
2,701 |
41,279 |
2009-10 |
41,279 |
12,000 |
53,279 |
8.0% |
7.0% |
3,730 |
57,009 |
2010-11 |
57,009 |
12,000 |
69,009 |
8.0% |
7.0% |
4,831 |
73,839 |
2011-12 |
73,839 |
12,000 |
85,839 |
8.6% |
7.6% |
6,524 |
92,363 |
2012-13 |
92,363 |
12,000 |
104,363 |
8.7% |
7.7% |
8,036 |
112,399 |
2013-14 |
112,399 |
12,000 |
124,399 |
8.7% |
7.7% |
9,579 |
133,978 |
2014-15 |
133,978 |
12,000 |
145,978 |
8.7% |
7.7% |
11,240 |
157,218 |
2015-16 |
157,218 |
12,000 |
169,218 |
8.7% |
7.7% |
13,030 |
182,248 |
(Note: For illustration purpose only; based on actual interest rates and other provisions of PPF)
So in the above case, a sum of Rs 1,82,248 will be payable to you. The
following table shows you how your account would have otherwise worked
had you continued.
Under Normal Circumstances, Your PPF Account Would Work Like This...
Year |
Opening Balance |
Fresh Deposits |
Total Amount |
Rate Applicable
On These Accounts |
Interest Accrued |
Outstanding Balance |
2006-07 |
0 |
12,000 |
12,000 |
8.0% |
960 |
12,960 |
2007-08 |
12,960 |
12,000 |
24,960 |
8.0% |
1,997 |
26,957 |
2008-09 |
26,957 |
12,000 |
38,957 |
8.0% |
3,117 |
42,073 |
2009-10 |
42,073 |
12,000 |
54,073 |
8.0% |
4,326 |
58,399 |
2010-11 |
58,399 |
12,000 |
70,399 |
8.0% |
5,632 |
76,031 |
2011-12 |
76,031 |
12,000 |
88,031 |
8.6% |
7,571 |
95,602 |
2012-13 |
95,602 |
12,000 |
107,602 |
8.7% |
9,361 |
116,963 |
2013-14 |
116,963 |
12,000 |
128,963 |
8.7% |
11,220 |
140,183 |
2014-15 |
140,183 |
12,000 |
152,183 |
8.7% |
13,240 |
165,423 |
2015-16 |
165,423 |
12,000 |
177,423 |
8.7% |
15,436 |
192,859 |
(Note: For illustration purpose only; based on actual interest rates and other provisions of PPF)
Now you must have observed the difference. Since you earn 1% lower each
year, you receive a considerably lower amount at the premature closure.
PersonalFN believes, the Government by permitting access to money in
case of dire urgency has addressed to the liquidity needs. But we think that you would be better-off not banking on your PPF account to cater to medical emergencies. Instead it would wise to build a sufficient contingency fund and buy a health insurance policy with an adequate coverage
amid times when healthcare cost is galloping. Likewise, to address to
your child’s higher education needs, engage in prudent financial
planning right since the time he/she attends playschool or Kindergarten;
the earlier the better, and invest in suitable wealth creating
investment avenues that can keep pace with rising cost of higher
education.
The above approach would ensure that you do not touch your retirement
savings until you actually retire. PersonalFN believes, rather than
being in a situation where you have no option but to close your PPF
account, you should plan to handle contingent situations and financial
goals in life in an efficient manner. At PersonalFN, we help people
achieve their financial goals by offering unbiased and independent advice on financial planning and investment planning.
Tax evaders are going to have a tough time now. In a drive to increase the number of taxpayers
and ensure more people pay income tax, the Central Board of Direct
Taxes (CBDT) is gearing up. Recently, the Prime Minister, Mr Narendra
Modi advised the CBDT to take the number of taxpayers to 10 crore from
current 5.4 crore.
Addressing a joint conference held for the CBDT and CBEC (Central Board of Excise and Customs), Mr Modi said, “While
there should be respect for the rule of law among all citizens, and
even fear of the long arm of the law for those who evade taxes, people
should not fear tax administrators.”
The Prime Minister also provided tax boards with a roadmap for achieving
administrative reforms in tax departments. He expects the tax
departments to improve their performance in the following areas.
The potential positives of the scheme:
- Revenue
- Accountability
- Probity
- Information
- Digitisation
Taking cues from the Prime Minister, CBDT seems to have decided to get
tough on tax evaders and on those who don’t file tax returns despite
being required to submit. The department has identified three categories
to target non-filers...
- Those who pay some tax but don’t file returns;
- Those who pay no tax or file returns but have performed some PAN based transactions; and
- People about whom only non-PAN based information is available
The tax department also endeavours to maintain the records of
non-filers, and follow them meticulously to identify those who are
likely to miss their tax liabilities in future. The taxmen are expected
to improve their criminal investigation abilities and establish
prosecution even in cases where the disputed tax liability is lower than
Rs 50,000.
And here are the punitive measures...
- Henceforth, the taxmen may block the PAN numbers of tax evaders;
- If needed, credit lines may be cut
- You may even be denied cooking gas subsidies
- Once the PAN is blocked, registering properties may get difficult for tax evaders.
The CBDT has a target of a little over 8.47 lakh crore for FY 2016-17.
Thus it’s a blow tax evaders with a directive to take harsh measures to
increase tax collection. PersonalFN, believes paying tax apart from
being a constitutional duty, should be viewed as moral responsibility
that should not be dodged at any cost. Always pay your tax dues and file returns on time.
How far from the truth is it to say this Government is short on ideas to
raise revenues? While it speeds up the process of implementing reforms,
by clearing more projects and scaling up infrastructure,
it uses dirty tactics to accumulate funds for them. When a road is
constructed or a port is built, the ministry will claim credit and it
should. However,
nobody bothers to check where the funds came from to execute these
projects. Does this Government have the courage to publicly admit that
it trampled the dreams of citizens and siphoned their money to fund
developmental projects?
The last thing on Earth the Government can do is to utilise a citizen’s
assets for the National Agenda without one’s consent. It is planning to
channelise unclaimed deposits in EPF,
PPF, and Small Savings Schemes (SSS) to fund various projects of
national interest. The present Government may not be as corrupt as the
previous Government was, but, then, why it is desperate to
demonstrate its moral hazards by doing something as devastating as
channelizing personal assets of the poor/common man to the Nation’s
coffers. This is not a case of Minimum Government and Maximum
Governance.
India’s Finance Minister, who himself is a renowned lawyer, laid the foundation for this loot in Budget 2016-17.
The Government proposed to set up a fund backed by unclaimed deposits
in aforesaid schemes to finance the welfare programmes for elderly
people. As reported by the Economic Times dated June 15, 2016, the
unclaimed money
lying in EPF accounts is worth a whopping Rs 43,000 crores. No wonder
the Government is trying to acquire it, by hook or crook. At present, no
other established source can feed it such a large sum of money in one
go. The question is, why does anyone have to claim their money? Why
can’t it be automatically paid back to a person it belongs to?
That being said, the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) has
taken some initiatives to identify and reach the account holders who
have failed to claim their deposits. The Government is wasting no
opportunity to assert its achievements and has been shouting about them
from the rooftop. Why the same approach cannot be adopted to tracing
these account holders?
|